Comments -
allComments
|
Sunday, 10 May 2009 06:00 |
Hi, JJ:
You are a very discriminating judge. You never gave Pacman credit. Is it Pacman’s fault that the present crop of challengers to his crown is a bunch of underachievers and over-the-hills?
Your judgment borders on a cynic, or doubting Thomas, like the Philippine Supreme Court some years ago, when it could not prove that that there was cheating in the bar exams, it passed all the bar examinees. At least, even the cheaters were given credit. Ha! Ha! Ha!
The only downside is that some of those who passed the bar did not append “Attorneys” in their names in their business cards. There was no pride on something you did not work very hard to get.
For me, I will give Pacman credit, where credit is due.
Pacman stepped up to the plate as others are still waiting to learn the ropes or are waiting in the wings for Pacman to leave the scene or retire or go on a disabled list before they take their turn.
Have a nice day!
Joseph
JOSEPH G. LARIOSA
Journal Group Link International
P. O. BOX 805072
CHICAGO IL 60680-4112 U.S.A.
Telefax No. 773.283.5986
Email: lariosa_jos@sbcglobal.net
Newer news items:
Older news items:
|