Comments -
allComments
|
Sunday, 08 November 2009 17:39 |
The fight vs. dela Hoya was suspiciously one sided although dela Hoya admitted he was dehydrated. the vs. hatton fight was legit and i attribute that to the fact that hatton's style is tailor made for Pacman. but if Pac beats cotto and his victory turns out to be as one sided as his match vs. De la Hoya, I would really be very suspicious. Just take a look at Cotto's matches against Juddah, Mosley and Gomez, which are all available via you tube.
Styles make fights. Holmes almost lost to Ken norton in 1978. Cooney KOd Norton in less thant 1 minute of the 1st round in 1981. the foll year Holmes TKOd cooney in the 13th. on paper you'd think cotto has a definite advantage, ie. higher weight div., high KO percentage, very good jab, very good chin, only 1 questionable loss...compare that to Pacquiao, lost to Morales, almost lost to Marquez, beat washed up delaHoya, beat up stationary hatton, yet Pac is the favorite....am i missing something?
Dido
Newer news items:
Older news items:
|