You are not logged in.

Login

Username

Password

Remember me
Password Reminder
No account yet? Create one

Who's Online

We have 31 guests online

Chat



You must be a registered user to shout!
Get your account here!

RSS Feed

Subcribe to MabuhayRadio
Home arrow Columns arrow Reinventing the Philippines arrow Reinventing the Philippine Military to Prevent the Coming of a Junta
Reinventing the Philippine Military to Prevent the Coming of a Junta
User Rating: / 3
PoorBest 
Written by Bobby Reyes - May 15, 2007 at 05:31 PM   

Part One of "Reinventing the Philippine Military" Series 

 

An alumnus of the Philippine Military Academy (PMA) asked hypothetically this writer the possible reaction of the United States government if a military junta were to take over the Philippine government? He asked me also the probable reaction of the Filipino-American community to the rule by the Philippine military?

 

I answered also hypothetically. I said that the United States and Filipino Americans would not support a military takeover of the Philippine Government. But . . .  

 

Overseas Filipinos, especially American citizens of Philippine descent, are fed up with the apparent inability of Filipino civilian leaders and the top brass of the Philippine military to eradicate corruption in the Philippine bureaucracy and provide the basic needs of the people (housing, employment, security, economic opportunities, etc.)

 

The Overseas-Filipino World (OFW) may not offer much resistance to the imposition of military rule in the Philippines. I said that if the OFW, especially Filipino Americans, will not protest vehemently military rule in the homeland, American politicians might probably take a wait-and-see attitude before it “recognizes” the new Philippine government.

 

I said that this would be so, especially if the three PMA alumni who ran in yesterday's election for the Philippine Senate (Sen. Panfilo Lacson, and alleged coup leaders Gregorio Honasan III and Antonio Trillanes IV) were to win or even make a very strong showing. The political mandate generated by these three PMAyer-candidates would be tantamount to an argument that the military has the support of the people in moving for reforms.

 

But I said that a military junta is not the solution to the pressing problems of the Philippines. I opined that it would be better if the soldiers would stay in the barracks and a “reinvention” of the Philippine military were to take place in an orderly and constitutional process.

The Lesson of “Black Jack” Pershing

In reality, making the Philippines into a huge military camp would not solve the country’s problems. Military solutions have not worked in defusing the Moro rebellion in Mindanao and eliminating the threat of the New People’s Army (NPA) communist cadres. Why? Even during the American occupation of the Philippines, some of West Point’s best and brightest graduates could not defeat the Moro warriors. Gen. John J. “Black Jack” Pershing, with his training in West Point and in the Indian Wars, became the top leader of the American forces in Mindanao in the 1910s. But he failed. General “Black Jack” could not earn a 21-gun salute and defeat the native Filipino-Muslim warriors. And there was no way of turning the pacification campaign into genocide. General Pershing failed to make a name in Mindanao. He became, however, the celebrated American hero in Europe during World War I, where he was sent after his undistinguished career in Mindanao.

 

Yes, General Pershing and his soldiers could defeat the Prussian and the Ottoman empires but they could not win against the Sultanate of Sulu and other Moro tribes in Mindanao.

 

On the other hand, President Ramon Magsaysay was able to defeat the Hukbalahap (communist) rebellion in the early 1950s by winning the hearts and minds of the rebels. Starting as the Defense Secretary of President Elpidio Quirino, Mr. Magsaysay won the psychological warfare (psy war) and brought the rebels who surrendered to Mindanao, which was then made into a Filipino version of the Biblical Promised Land. In Mindanao, the former rebels were given agricultural land and opportunities to lead new productive but peaceful lives. (Unfortunately after President Magsaysay died in a plane accident on March 17, 1957, Mindanao slowly became the Land of Broken Promises, or at least the land of promising politicians who never delivered on their promises of socioeconomic reforms.)

 

With due respect to the armed-forces leadership of the Philippines and to retired Gens. Fidel V. Ramos (a former Philippine President) and Panfilo Lacson and Honasan (a former senator), Trillanes and Company, military solutions have never worked in Mindanao.

 

Resort to military formulae has not worked either in the barrios in LuzonVisayan Islands where the communist rebels operate. The Spanish and American colonizers tried but failed to subdue the Moro Filipino freedom fighters for almost 400 years. 
 

According to Sen. Aquilino Q. Pimentel, Jr., the Moro leadership had assured him that one of two workable solutions is the adoption of a Federal System of Government (FSG). The other solution is to grant outright independence to the secessionist movement in Mindanao. 

 

 

The civilian leaders of the Philippines may wish to address the reforms needed for the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) and the Philippine National Police (PNP). If I were a top legislator of the homeland, I will file several urgent bills to “reinvent” the Philippine military. The first bill needed in reinventing the military is to change the Philippine criminal-justice system (please go to http://www.mabuhayradio.com/content/view/34/90/  if you have not read it yet).

 

 

 

(Click here to read Part 2 . . .)

 


Bookmark this Article
Add to Blink
Add to Del.icio.us
Add to Digg
Add to Furl
Add to Google
Add to Simpy
Add to Yahoo!MyWeb
Add to Spurl


User Comments
RIGHT LEADERSHIP IS KEY 
 
Then Secretary of National Defense Ramon 
Magsaysay showed the way on how to deal with rebel 
Hukbalahaps. The Huks were gaining sympathizers 
because the Philippine Army was committing human- 
rights violtions. In our town in Bulacan, many 
able-bodied males were picked up and tortured in a 
notorious military camp. To avoid being picked up and 
tortured, many from our barrio simply joined the Huk 
movement. Our own barrio produced at least two Huk 
commanders.  
 
Still, there was a great difference between then 
and now. Those picked up then were merely tortured. 
In general, after less than a week, they were 
released. Now, we know that most of the victims never 
returned to their families.  
 
Defense Secretary Ramon Magsaysay stopped the 
human rights violations of the Philippine Army. As a 
result, the barrio folks no longer feared them. 
Eventually, those who joined the Huks for fear of the 
military surrendered and went back to their peaceful 
lives in our barrio. Others found new settlement in 
the government-designated place in Mindanao, developed 
by EDCOR.  
 
So the claim that Col. Edward Landsdale and the 
CIA merely created Ramon Magsaysay (from the book 
Portrait of a Cold Warrior, if my memory serves) is a BIG 
LIE. It was more a case of them betting on the right 
horse. Magsaysay would win the then presidential 
elections even without the help of the CIA because he 
made reforms in the military that were felt all the 
way down to the grassroots--the many poor folks in the 
countryside who loved him and gave him a landslide 
victory. In addition, he inspired hope among many 
Filipinos. I saw the mammoth crowd that greeted then 
presidential candidate Magsaysay in our town--a great 
contrast to the subdued crowd in the subsequent visit 
of the rival President Elpidio Quirino. 
 
Proof that the CIA's help was not the cause of 
Magsaysay's victory: After his death, in the next 
presidential elections, the CIA supported Manuel 
Manahan, a Magsaysay boy, yet he lost to the 
nationalist Carlos P. Garcia of Bohol, who espoused 
the Filipino First policy--the policy undone later by 
the free-market economist and lawyer President 
Diosdado P. Macapagal.  
 
Unfortunately, what Magsaysay did that endeared 
him to barrio folks was never given wide publicity and 
is generally unknown in urban areas. I have first hand 
information of it because as a pre-school boy, I saw 
how even our tenants were arrested by the military, 
and how my brothers and our tenants feared the 
military more than the Huks. In fact, two of our 
tenants were executed by the military on the mere 
suspicion that they were Huks because they were not 
wearing hats when the military encountered them, as 
relayed by one similarly captured by the military but 
released later. I know for a fact that they were not 
Huks because they had always stayed in our farm where 
they worked. What's more, they did not have guns. I 
myself saw their decomposing bodies in a creek not far 
from the barrio. Up to now, I cannot forget the 
wailing of their bereaved mother when they were buried 
right in the place where they were found. At that 
time, there was no complaint made against the military 
because it was useless to do so.  
 
Aside from executing two of our tenants, the military 
also burned our big farmhouse that overlooked our vast 
riceland and cornland. We never replaced that big 
farmhouse again. These cruel and unkind incidents, 
Magsaysay put an end to--and I am one of countless 
barrio people who silently thanked him for it. His 
good deed and service to the nation is etched in our 
memory.  
 
If we come to think of it, the culprit is not the 
Philippine Army per se but just its LEADERSHIP--then 
and now. The great majority of the military are loyal 
servants of the nation who risk their lives for their 
country.  
 
At present, with the disappearances and killings 
of alleged NPA sympathizers, the military will have an 
even harder time fighting the NPA's. The reason is 
that the rebels are fighting a guerrilla warfare. 
Their faces and whereabouts are unknown. The possible 
link in finding them--who else if not their supposed 
sympathizers--are gone now and eliminated. Therefore, 
the means of catching the NPA's once they come down 
from the mountains and visit barangays--no longer 
exist because apparently killed by the military that 
need them for the valuable intelligence information 
that they can provide!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! So how will the 
military find the NPA's now who merely conduct hit and 
run operations????? Get my point?  
 
Mar Tecson 
As posted originally in the Cebu Politics Forum 
(

Comment by GUEST on 2007-05-15 19:21:39 Using IP: 76.171.11.152

Bobby, Thanks for furnishing me a preview of yours and the attached article. It brought fond memories of my (psy-war ) work with the then Sec. Ramon Magsaysay and the late BGen.(Ret) Jose Crisol, (PMA-42) during those trying days of bringing back the dissident to the folds of the law. 
If you want to present a factual presentation on the subject matter, I suggest you get hold of the book, "The Red Lie," we produced in 1954, as a psy-war group in a little-known Civil Affairs Section of the Department of Defense. That obscure Section was initially organized under the then, Col. Nick T.Jimenez, then turned over to the then Col. Jose Crisol,PMA '42. And the psy-war staff whose names were declassified for public consumpton were: Colonels: Jose Ma. Guerrero, Eulogio Dua, Jose Angeles, USAFFE Bataan Death March survivors and myself, Col.(Ret.US) Frank B. Quesada, associate PMA '44. World War-II POW. Other (a dozen names) have not been declassified. Albeit civilian psy-war experts i.e., Atty. Juan Gualberto Planas and Fr. Arthur Weiss,S.J. 
All of us were under the then National Defense Secretary Ramon Magsaysay, who served as the inspiration that made us write that book. It is a factual resume of our work .The book is a compledium of how we, Filipino craftsmen particularly delved deep into the Communist ideology long ignored, as well as its toxic capacity understimated. No one but us understood the "Huk" problem which was no less a national agrarian society in revolt - a real threat to tne Philippine Republic. I can not acccount for the much bruited about some arm-chair participation of supposed U.S. publicized advisers whom we were unable to meet .  
I was practically in the vortex of the campaign due to my pre-war association to, and with a comrade in the Philippine Army, the then Lt. (Res.) Reg Taruc, younger brother of the Huk Supremo LuisTaruc. Reg is a World War-II comrade who fought against the Japanese Imperial invading forces, however, was an indoctrinated member of the "Hukbalahap" (Hukbo ng bansa laban sa Hapon) The "Huks "as they were briefly called, were a formidable army of 12,000 regulars with proven support of over a hundred-thousand peasants in Central Luzon. Luis Taruc was the Supremo who was elected congressman, but denied a seat in the new Philippine Congress by elitist Filipino politicians.  
Luis took to the hills to evade further persecution and led the Huks into an armed struggle against brother Filipino elitists who would not accept Luis as a legislator. Thus, an open dissident war erupted.  
However, Luis miscalculated the odds; the dynamic Filipino leader, Ramon Magsaysay, a comrade of mine in World War-II from Zambales, whose outfit was organized and manned by my comrades in the Hunters-ROTC Guerrillas led by Phil. Military Academy (PMA) officers and university cadets. Magsaysay rose from Congressman to Secretary of National Defense - turned goverment battalions into effective counter-insurgency force with U.S aid (materials but not troops) they crushed the rebellion. ## 
If you want to interview my fellow WW-II comrade Col (Ret.) .Reg.Taruc, now age 90 , a US recognized WW-II veteran. He is here in Illinois, with his wife Gloria Aquino, cousin of the late Sen.Benigno Aquino Jr., He can elucidate on the Philippne Agraian Society Revolt, of which he is an authority, not to leave out how we, and Sec. Magsaysay convinced the Huks to lay down their arms and live peacefully under the fold of the law. Your treatise could be helpful to the AFP, if you submit it for evaluation. It, however, has to be scrutinized by the Dept. of National Defense. And it could be a supplementary reading of Philippine history. I will be gad to have a printed copy of each of your articles listed in your posting. Best wishes. 
>> 
Dept.of National Defense DND) AFP.
Comment by GUEST on 2007-05-16 02:35:42 Using IP: 76.171.11.152

You hit the nail on the head. From what I heard or read somewhere General Pershing signed a peace treaty with the Philippine Muslims which was the only way to end the "insurrection." 
 
Rene of Chino Hills, CA 

Comment by GUEST on 2007-05-16 02:09:23 Using IP: 76.171.11.152


Your Name / Email Address:

Please enter the above numbers