Sections
Humor and Satire
A New “USSR2” Being Formed in Some Philippine Islands?
| A New “USSR2” Being Formed in Some Philippine Islands? |
No man is an island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of the continent, a part of the main . . . any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind, and, therefore, never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee. –
There is a rumor going on in the Filipino Internet world that some Filipino-American leaders who hail from Samar and Romblon Islands are forming what they tentative call the “Union of Socialist Samar and Romblon Republics” (USSR2).
To read this particular work of John Donne, please click on this link http://incompetech.com/authors/donne/bell.html
So, armed with the quote from John Donne, I called up a former University of the Philippines professor, Cesar Torres, who is the acknowledged leader of the Samarnon community in Northern California. I lifted the words of John Donne, who happens to be Professor Torres’ favorite writer and tried to convey the message that “no man is an island,” etceteras, etc.
I said to Professor Torres: “Is the USSR2 a Donne deal, oops, done deal?”
The former UP faculty member actually evaded the issue. He replied that I better get hold of Doc Simp, the venerable leader of the Romblon-American community, who commutes from Chicago to Romblon on a regular basis. I said that I have actually e-mailed Doc Simp but he referred me in turn to his alter ego, Antonio bulog, who appears to be the supremo of the Romblon faction in the USSR2 movement.
So I phoned Mr. Bulog – in a three-way hook up with Professor Torres – and I got an earful of his much-vaunted Bulogisms. Both the professor and the pundit said that the words of John Donne do not apply to the Philippine scenario because the homeland is an archipelago and not a continent. And secondly, Mr. Bulog said that some men are like the Sumo wrestlers of Japan or the First Gentleman Mike Arroyo and they are like continents in bulk and height.
And so, without admitting anything, both Professor Torres and Pundit Bulog hinted that should the Arroyo Dispensation move for the outright grant of independence to Muslim Mindanao, the islands of Samar and Romblon might follow suit. And declare their own independence? All they replied were hypothetical answers.
Like when Professor Torres said that how could the bells toll in Samar when Wyoming has not returned the bells to Balangiga town of Eastern Samar?
This writer asked Professor Torres if it were true that the initials of the PPP, the OFW-led political party that he was forming, actually stood for the “Pulajanes Political Party”?
Professor Torres laughed at the idea, although he said that the Pulajanes was a religion-based rebellion and not a political advocacy.
(Editor’s Note: To read more about the Pulajanes rebels, please go to Paul Dimayuga’s article, http://www.bibingka.com/phg/religious/default.htm.)
I inquired from Pundit Bulog if he realized that the Philippine ambassador to the United States, H. E. Willy C. Gaa, is a distinguished son of Romblon? I asked if the position of Ambassador Gaa might be compromised by the formation of the USSR2? He answered that Ambassador Gaa has nothing to do with the movement. Mr. Bulog said that in reality the movement would want Mr. Gaa to become the first USSR2 president.
(To be continued . . .)
Eddie
Dear Dr. Eddie:
Thank you for your feedback.
RE: Doc Simp Fabicon and his alter ego, Antonio Bulog. I mentioned them in the satire of an article, A New “USSR2” Being Formed in Some Philippine Islands? They may be forming the USSR2 (??).
The USSR2 means the "Union of Socialist Samar and Romblon Republics."
If you cannot access the hyperlink, then please copy and paste to your browser this URL, http://www.mabuhayradio.com/content/view/1762/51/
Mabuhay and Happy Reading,
Bobby M. Reyes
Editor
www.mabuhayradio.com
My best friend, Rodel Rodis, is always late. Instead of writing a column about the possibility of renaming the Philippines, he should have just commented on the following articles published in January 2008:
The Great Debate among Botomites of Whether to Change the Name of the Philippine Archipelago or Not (by Bobby Reyes in Sections / Humor & Satire)
A New “USSR2” Being Formed in Some Philippine Islands?
(the USSR2 is the suggested name for the proposed Republic of Samar-Romblon).
Happy reading and have a happier weekend,
Mabuhay,
Bobby M. Reyes
Editor
www.mabuhayradio.com
-------------- Original message from : --------------
"...no need to tell you how he repelled the conqueror." - Ben
we all can believe what we want to believe. was magellan a conqueror who wanted to kill lapu-lapu in the battle of mactan OR was magellan an innocent and gullible stooge used by rajah humabon and datu zula to settle their personal grudges against lapu-lapu? was magellan their ignorant and willing fall guy?
when we look around at what is happening today in the batasan with all our present-day provincial rajahs trying to wrest power from each other, and the muslims asking the middle-eastern leaders for help to settle their grudges with the christians of the north, does that not seem familiar with what happened between magellan and lapu-lapu almost 500 years ago?
when the volunteer muslim middle-eastern fighters get killed in mindanao, is it because they want to CONQUER the philippines for themselves, or are they helping out their muslim friends, just like magellan tried to help catholic-convert humabon in his fight with lapu-lapu? what has lapu-lapu got to do with philippine nationalism? NOTHING!!! lapu-lapu's fight was with humabon who tried to use magellan as his tool to kill lapu-lapu.
"After Magellan landed on the island of Homonhon on March 17, 1521, he parleyed with Rajah Calambu (or Kolambu) of Limasawa, who guided him to Cebu, on April 7. Communicating through his interpreter, Enrique, Magellan befriended Rajah Humabon also known as Rajah Hamabar, the king of Cebu, and he and his queen were baptized into the Catholic faith, taking the Christian names Carlos and Juana. Magellan gave Juana the Santo Niño as a symbol of the alliance. Impressed by Magellan's armament (consisting of guns, swords, armor, 12 cannons, and 50 crossbows), Humabon and Datu Zula convinced Magellan to go to the nearby island of Mactan and kill rival chieftain Lapu-Lapu.
It is widely believed that Humabon and Lapu-Lapu bore each other grudges and were constantly fighting for control of territory.[1]
[1] Abellana, Jovito (1952). "Aginid Bayok sa Atong Tawarik." "
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Mactan
the native warlords and datus of today, coming from the many islands, and walking in the halls of the batasan, are still as belligerent and fractious and combative as the native warlords and datus of magellan's time.
even the many native warlords of fil-ams in california, new york and other states fight among themselves long after they have immigrated to the united states and have become american citizens. leopards never change their spots.
"They are a barbarous people, in whom one cannot place confidence. They are much given to killing and to attacking the settlements of the other natives, in which they commit many depredations; and there is nothing that can be done to stop them, or to subdue or pacify them, ...." - Morga (1609)
maybe it is appropriate then to call the 7,100 islands "LAPU-LAPU" in honor of the many native warlords (like aguinaldo and marcos) who have killed their political enemies to perpetuate their power. some may want to include GMA to that list of native warlords who will stop at nothing to rule forever like marcos.
bobby
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From:
To: ;
CC: placido05@
Subject: Re: Renaming the RP
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 14:25:27 +0000
Eddie,
To change the name of the Philippines to "bayanihan"it dosen't sound good, and also I believe, the word is an "adjective",why not spend a little time to research the real name of "lapu-lapu",this man if only European, is as great or better than Alexander the great, no need to tell you how he repelled the conqueror.
Ben
-------------- Original message from Placido Calderon : --------------
Thanks Rodel for your e-mail. The name bayanihan will be a very good name as it evokes the sense of partnership that Filipinos have when they are helping others who need help especially when building a home.
I kind of wonder whether our high government both elected and appointed would be amenable to a name change such as the changes you cited here. (Please note that Ulan Bator is the capital of Mongolia and not the country itself).
Yes many nations have adopted change and even Peking is now known as Beijing. Agana, the capital of Guam was also changed to Hagatna. The 5 Muslim countries that were former Soviet Republics also changed their names to include the last word of Stan to denote that they are Muslim countries. They are Kyrgyzstan which used to be Kyrgyzsia or Kyrgyz Republic, et cetera. The other Muslim countries are Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, and Tajikistan.
Yes the Philippines was named after Rey Felipe or King Phillip of Spain. But the question again is whether our government officials and majority of our people will agree to a name change. And as you suggest Bayanihan is a very nice word and will be a nice name for a country that has the tradition of helping each other in time of need.
Eddie
Telltale Signs/ NAME CHANGE FOR THE PHILIPPINES
Rodel E. Rodis, August 25, 2008
When I visited Manila in January of 2006, a city councilor I knew excitedly informed me that his council had just voted to change the name of the Philippines . What? The country would no longer be named after a ruthless Spanish despot? We would finally be rid of this last vestige of colonialism? Hallelujah!
Breathlessly, I asked my friend, Councilor Cassie Sison, to pray tell me what name the good City Council of Manila had proposed.
“The Philippine Islands,” he replied.
After I recovered from my disappointment and picked up my jaw from the floor, I heard Cassie explain that Manila Mayor Lito Atienza believed that the country would draw more tourists if a more exotic name could replace the staid “Republic of the Philippines ”. The proposed name, Cassie said, would conjure dreamy images of palm trees, cool breezes and sandy beaches.
While the country's name change would be at or near the bottom of the nation’s immediate priorities, it should not be ignored because there is no other country in the world that is named after a mass
murderer.
If Ceylon could be changed to Sri Lanka , Mongolia to Ulan Bator , Siam to Thailand , Leningrad to St. Petersburg , Peking to Beijing , why can't the Philippines change its name?
When Ferdinand Magellan “discovered” the islands on March 16, 1521, he named it the Archipelago de San Lazaro. We would have been called “Lazaroans” if Magellan had survived the Battle of Mactan against LapuLapu on April 27, 1521.
Three unsuccessful Spanish expeditions followed Magellan but all failed to reach “San Lazaro”. The fourth expedition, led by Capt. Ruy Lopez de Villalobos, reached Sarangani Island off the eastern coast of Mindanao on February 2, 1543. He renamed the islands “Felipinas” after the crown prince of Spain , Felipe II, the son of Spanish King Carlos V.
Villalobos left “Las Islas Felipinas” after eight months and sailed to the Moluccas where he died. It would not be until 1572 when the Felipinas islands would become a colony of the Spanish empire.
By then, the crown prince had become King Felipe II and he was to rule Spain from 1556 to 1598. He would also rule the Netherlands and Portugal (starting in 1581) as well as the kingdoms of Milan , Naples and Sicily . In his time, Felipe II was the most powerful monarch in the world and it was said that the sun did not set on his empire.
When he became master of the Netherlands , Felipe II reenacted the Edict of 1550 which prohibited the printing, copying, keeping, buying or giving of any book written by Luther, Calvin or other “heretics”
condemned by the Holy Church or the breaking or damaging of any image of the Holy Virgin or any Vatican-canonized saints. The penalty for Edict-breakers would be death by the sword for men and burning at the stake for women. Informers against suspects were to be entitled on conviction to half the property of the accused.
Before burning his opponents at the stake, this Catholic King insisted on going through an “Auto da Fe”, a religious ceremony which accompanied the sentencing of heretics by the Inquisition. Among the victims of Felipe’s inquisition were more than 10,000 Lutherans and more than 80,000 Andalucian Moriscos, Spanish Moors who had converted to Catholicism but who had violated Felipe’s edict prohibiting the speaking of the Arabic language or retaining of any of their ethnic culture.
While he was still crown prince, Felipe II married his first cousin, Princess Maria of Portugal , who provided him with a son, Don Carlos of Spain (1545-1568). Following Maria's death in 1546, he married Catholic Queen Mary I of England in 1554 to cement an alliance with England .
After Queen Mary died in 1558, Felipe wanted to marry her successor, the Protestant Queen Elizabeth I but the plan failed. He blamed his son, Don Carlos, for the failure of the planned marriage and had him imprisoned where he later died.
Felipe then married his son’s fiancée, Princess Elisabeth of Valois, daughter of Henri II of France . Elisabeth provided him with two daughters, but no son. So Felipe married Anne, daughter of
the Emperor Maximilian II, who provided him with an heir, Felipe III.
While he was engaged in wars with the Dutch, Felipe II put together the largest Spanish fleet (Armada) ever assembled, more than 100 ships with more than 30,000 men, to invade England in 1588. The pretext was Queen Elizabeth’s execution of Mary, the Catholic Queen of Scots. But English guile and the “Protestant Wind” thwarted Felipe’s ambitions, and destroyed the Spanish fleet.
When Felipe died in 1598, Spain was bankrupt and in decline as a European power.
What does it mean then to be named after Felipe, to be called Felipinos (later changed to Filipinos), to be "like Felipe", to be intolerant of other people and other religions?
Changing the name would also end all the confusion about the spelling of the country (Phillipines) or the people (Philippinos).
When Andres Bonifacio formed the Katipunan revolutionary organization against Spain in 1896, he refused to use the term “Filipinas”, preferring Tagalog or “Katagalugan” to refer to the country.
Others objected on the grounds that Pilipinas sounded too much like “Alipinas” (land of slaves). Some have proposed “Kapatiran” (brotherhood) or “Katipunan”. Others have suggested “Luzviminda”
referring to the country’s three major group of islands.
In the late 1970s, the Dictator Ferdinand Marcos (who should have been named after Felipe the despot) seriously attempted to change the name of the country to “Maharlika”, the “warrior-noble” in pre-colonial Felipinas who, like the Samurai class of Japan, rendered military service to his feudal lord. But his proposal went nowhere.
If countries like Bolivia could be named after their liberators, why can’t the Pilipinas be named after Rizal? We would all be Rizalians.
My personal preference would be to call the country “Bayanihan” and we would all be “bayanis” (heroes) bound together in the "Bayanihan" spirit of working for the common good.
(Please send your comments to or log on to rodel50.blogspot.com or write to Law Offices of Rodel Rodis at 2429 Ocean Avenue , San Francisco , CA 94127 , or call (415) 334-7800.)
Let's just form our own Federation of Abaca Republics - Bicol, Samar, Leyte, Biliran, or wherever else is into producing lots of copra and abaca. However...USSR2 does sound appealing to me. And since Samar is the big the island, I'd have enough votes to become Generalissimo.
That Magallanes was killed in battle on Mactan Island is no longer debatable, even Yoyoy Villame proclaimed it. The problem with Magallanes or Magalhaes, is he listened to Humabon's sulsol. In other words, he was utu-uto.
Addi








