Columns
The Way I See It
Sergio Osmeña, the Founding Father
| Sergio Osmeña, the Founding Father |
What they don’t
know, just like most Filipinos everywhere, is that there would have been no
independence on
He accomplished
this by bridging and fusing the competing objectives of the colonizers out to
assert their imperial prerogatives and the Filipino nationalists who were for
immediate and absolute independence. He arbitrated the clashing personalities
and competing ideas of the Filipino leaders themselves who came from assorted
backgrounds, as disparate as the elite of the old Spanish establishment, the
officer ranks of the revolution, the hierarchy of the aborted short-lived
Philippine Republic, and the never-say-die patriots who were still fighting the
Americans in the far-flung provinces and islands of the country.
When Aguinaldo
was captured in Palanan, Isabela, and all the other leaders of the war between
the Philippine and the
The newly-vanquished
insurrectos, ill prepared to take the new colonials head-on, had to learn to
navigate the uncharted waters of the parliamentary struggle for independence.
This was the way pointed to them by the Americans where they could pursue
peacefully their desire of becoming independent.
Prominent
leaders of the short-lived Philippine republic already succumbed to the
American policy of attraction. The Partido Federalista collaborated openly with
them in trying to bring the country completely under their control. The Mabini “irreconcilables” were in the
Partido Nacionalista, which had “the support of Sergio Osmeña and Rafael
Palma.” Leadership soon passed to Osmeña
and Quezon, who turned its orientation less combative and more pragmatic, if it
was to succeed as the vehicle to carry the fight for Philippine independence.
Very little has
been written about Sergio Osmeña because he lived to fight in contemporary
political contests, and thus, outlived his great deeds. Ever a consensus
builder, and in the spirit of Filipino unity, he agreed to play second fiddle
to the more aggressive Quezon who eventually became a wartime President. Like Emilio Aguinaldo, he lived too long
to be overtaken by more dramatic historical events, that he
is honored today less than if he died younger at the height
of his political power.
Quezon admitted
that it was Osmeña who repackaged the demand for independence in a way that it
did not make the Americans feel threatened.
He also said that it was only Osmeña who was prepared and ready to step
up to the plate at the critical time when the Americans needed a national
leader because of his unique knowledge of American government he learned by
prepping himself up through self-study!
In Resil
Mojares book, Resistance and Collaboration in
Three years
later, he became a representative in
Author Mojares
observed that around this time, “Osmeña quickly saw, not long after the start
of the Filipino-American hostilities, the inevitability of American
victory. He saw that both personal and
national aspirations had to be pursued within the realities of the American
rule. Towards this end, he assiduously applied himself to the understanding of
American law, politics, and government.”
He was already learning English in
Osmeña’s wartime
company with the Buencaminos, delas Alases, cited above, and his having brought
to Cebu, Rafael Palma, the future UP president, and Jaime de Veyra, who later
became an eminent writer/politician, to help him publish El Nuevo Dia, the
first daily newspaper in the province, demonstrated that he was already well
positioned and rightly connected to the proper people and places in Manila
society. This was indeed heady stuff to
an illegitimate child of an unmarried shopkeeper, although kept in
respectable life style by the patronage and support of very wealthy maternal
uncles.
Osmeña and
Quezon took the same 1903 bar examinations.
Already a member of the
The former
Governor General and later US Secretary of War William Howard Taft, visited
As
The secret of
the success of this Cebu, countryside-based
(PROMDI) leader was, among others, his success in handling lawless
elements; “pragmatic approach to
governance” according to Taft and US Gov. Gen. Henry C. Ide; executive ability,
cunning, persistence, quality as conciliator, trader, etc, according to
Governor Generals Forbes, Wood, etc.
Author Mojares
wrote in his book that Teodoro Kalaw, who later became a close aide of Quezon,
reported that Osmeña began to impress a wide array of leaders during his
frequent trips to
Thus, Osmeña,
in a speech at a banquet in honor of American Commissioner W. Morgan Shuster in
1906, laid “the case of the Filipino people” by saying that independence would
be “the logical result of the development of the American policy in the
Islands” and “to present for the first time the issue of independence, not as a
thesis wholly and separately that of the Filipinos, but as the logical result
and final flowering of the American occupation of the Philippines.”
He later
served as senator of the realm, Vice-President, and finally President when
Quezon died in








