You are not logged in.

Login

Username

Password

Remember me
Password Reminder
No account yet? Create one

Who's Online

We have 50 guests online

Chat



You must be a registered user to shout!
Get your account here!

RSS Feed

Subcribe to MabuhayRadio
Home arrow Sections arrow San Diego Happenings arrow Ms. Cudal Writes the MabuhayRadio About Romy Marquez's Reports
Ms. Cudal Writes the MabuhayRadio About Romy Marquez's Reports
User Rating: / 12
PoorBest 
Written by Bobby Reyes - Nov 30, 2007 at 11:09 AM   

Re: MabuhayRadio!: False news about Filipino leaders in San Diego

In a message dated 11/30/2007 1:02:04 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, writes:

This is an enquiry e-mail via http://www.mabuhayradio.com from:
Aurora S. Cudal < >

QUOTE. Please come to San Diego and conduct an impartial investigation into the allegations of Romeo Marquez. Why not report what is true about the shenanigans of Marquez here in San Diego? UNQUOTE.

Here is the reply of the www.mabuhayradio.com editor:

 

Ms. Aurora Cudal

Immediate Past President,

COPAO, and

Chair Emeritus, NaFFAA Chapter

San Diego, California

 

Dear Ms. Cudal:

Thank you for suggestion that we conduct an impartial investigation of the reports written by Romeo Marquez that the www.mabuhayradio.com published.

The investigative reports done by Mr. Marquez were in order. Let us examine for instance the report by Mr. Marquez that at least $27,000 of the funds of the COPAO were withdrawn illegally from its depositary bank during your presidency. Your defense was that the signatures of the COPAO checks cashed illegally were spurious (meaning, that the checks were stolen and that your signature in the said checks was forged).

All you had to do to answer the allegations of Mr. Marquez, as contained in his investigative reports, was to provide him and the public with the following evidence:

1.0  That immediately after discovering the supposed "theft" of the COPAO checks, you advised your depositary bank, which could identify as to who cashed (or deposited) the COPAO check. Banks would have refunded the COPAO checking account had you notified it that the checks in question were missing, presumed stolen and cashed illegally (by cashing it at the teller's window or depositing the checks with your forged signature in another bank account). But apparently, you and the COPAO treasurer never advised the bank that "stolen" checks with your forged signatures were being cashed time and time again until $27,000 was lost.

2.0  Had you reported that the COPAO checks were stolen and cashed illegally, then the bank's Security Department would have conducted a swift investigation and reported the matter to the police authorities for immediate action. Banks normally microfilm all the checks cashed and it has a foolproof system of determining as to who cashed any check issued by its depositors.

3.0  But -- apparently, as stated in the Marquez's investigative report -- you and your treasurer (your counter signatory of the said COPAO bank account) did not inform the bank and you just allowed the COPAO checks (with your alleged forged signature) to be cashed illegally. This meant also that you and your treasurer never bothered to reconcile the bank statement that the depositary bank sent to the COPAO at least on a monthly basis with your deposit-and-withdrawal records.

4.0  It would be hard to believe your contention that you were not aware of what happened to the COPAO bank account and that your signatures were forged in all the said COPAO checks.

I would be willing to go to San Diego and investigate the matter of the missing COPAO checks if you and/or the present COPAO president will send to me an authorization in writing that would authorize me to get copies of the microfilmed COPAO checks from your depository bank.

What is going for Mr. Marquez's report is the adage, "It is elementary, Mr. Watson." Even if the COPAO new officers refused to conduct their own investigation of the said alleged missing checks and the disappearance of $27,000 in its bank account, it would be hard to persuade the Court of  Public Opinion that you had nothing to do with the alleged "missing" checks of the COPAO, which "missing" (sic) checks were cashed with your "forged" (sic) signature.

And finally, if you and the other COPAO officers thought that the investigative reports of Mr. Marquez were libelous, then you could have sued him (and even the undersigned as the www.mabuhayradio.com editor for publishing Mr. Marquez's articles) for libel. Reporting Mr. Marquez to the Immigration authorities so that he could be deported as an "illegal alien" just made you and your fellow COPAO officers the modern Filipino-American versions of the Makapilis collaborators during the Japanese occupation of the Philippines. 

As they said before, "Guerillas tago, Makapili turo." Now, is it, "TNT tago, COPAO-NaFFAA Makapili turo"?

I will wait for the written authorization from the COPAO before I proceed to San Diego to begin the investigation, starting with the depositary bank of the COPAO.

 

Mabuhay,

 

Bobby M. Reyes

Editor

www.mabuhayradio.com


Bookmark this Article
Add to Blink
Add to Del.icio.us
Add to Digg
Add to Furl
Add to Google
Add to Simpy
Add to Yahoo!MyWeb
Add to Spurl


User Comments
Hi Bobby, 
 
I believe you should furnish the National City Police Department and the San Diego County District Attorney with copies of your reply to Mrs. Cudal. The issues you raised in your response to her might have been overlooked (deliberately or not?) Sometimes the most elementary questions are neglected. Since Mrs. Cudal appeared wearing her COPAO and NaFFAA hats this time, I believe you should also inform COPAO (email: ) and NaFFAA about her question and your responses. There are well-meaning COPAO and NaFFAA members who need not be dragged in this sad episode of lust for recognition and greed for money. Thanks. 
 
Romy Marquez
Comment by on 2007-11-30 12:40:33 Using IP: 207.200.116.6

 
Pareng Romy, 
 
Please allow me to be blunt: Are you an "illegal alien" as your detractors claim, or are you not? If you're not, why are they saying that you are? Do they have any basis to accuse you of that? Please bear in mind that I ask these questions as a friend. If you are an illegal alien, it wouldn't matter a bit to me and it wouldn't change the fact that I have a lot of respect and admiration for you as a fine journalist ... and as a friend. So, what's the story, pare? 
 
Or, shall I just shut up my trap and mind my own business? 
 
Take care. 
 
Jesse Jose
Comment by on 2007-11-30 13:36:43 Using IP: 64.12.117.195

In a message dated 11/30/2007 10:49:50 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, DiarioV writes: 
Hi Bobby (Reyes), 
 
I believe you should furnish the National City Police Department and the San Diego County District Attorney with copies of your reply to Mrs. Cudal.  
 
The issues you raised in your response to her might have been overlooked (deliberately or not?). Sometimes the most elementary questions are neglected.  
 
Since Mrs. Cudal appeared wearing her COPAO and NaFFAA hats this time, I believe you should also inform COPAO (email: ) and NaFFAA about her question and your responses.  
 
There are well-meaning COPAO and NaFFAA members who need not be dragged into this sad episode of lust for recognition and greed for money.  
 
I guess you should also inform the Filipino Press and Kalusugan Community Services since she could seek shelter in those establishments as a refuge from further questioning. 
 
Thanks. 
 
Romy Marquez 
 
* * * * 
 
Dear Romy and Friends: 
 
Please read my latest article on the Ben Menor criminal-case trial, which starts on Monday, Dec. 3, 2007. The article appears in the Front Page of the www.mabuhayradio.com. 
 
Here is the link: A December to Remember for the Filipino-American Community 
 
Once a guilty verdict is reached, as expected, my allies in San Jose, CA, and I will proceed to the California Attorney General to file our cases against the other NaFFAA national executive officers (those elected in San Jose in August 2002). Unfortunately, Ms. Alma Q. Kern will be involved, too, as she happens to be the current NaFFAA national chair. She will be receiving the service of summons. The guilty verdict will make our case against the NaFFAA NEOs stronger and more viable. We are expecting that many of the NaFFAA chapter officers in Northern and Southern California and Southern Nevada will be included in the investigation and/or indictment, along with the present national treasurer, Lourdes Corrales. 
 
Yes, we will include the complaint the ill-fated fundraising drive of the NaFFAA in San Diego, CA, in October 2003 (2-0-0-3), as well as the case of the missing $27,000, as the NaFFAA and the COPAO shared common officers and a similar modus operandi. 
 
As I have been saying since May 2000 (2-0-0-0), this is a never-say-die crusade to clean up the NaFFAA and its affiliated organizations such as the COPAO. And we will not rest until we have completely achieved the objectives. The turn of events is favoring our crusade, as never in our wildest dream did we foresee the City of San Jose and the District Attorney of Santa Clara County to go after Mr. Menor over the diversion of city funds to bankroll the NaFFAA convention in San Jose, CA, in August 2002. 
 
Mabuhay, 
 
Bobby M. Reyes
Comment by Bobby M. Reyes/ on 2007-11-30 14:50:33 Using IP: 76.171.11.152

Hi Jesse (Jose), 
 
One thing I admire in you is your being blunt . . . like a true swordsman that you are. 
 
In answer to your question, may I refer you to my Breaking News headlined "What Will Be Will Be". The lead should tell you everything. 
 
As to my detractors, let them vent their bloated gasbags and try to pollute the air with their most ridiculous claims. After all, they're free to express themselves in whatever manner they want. 
 
Romy Marquez
Comment by on 2007-11-30 15:51:19 Using IP: 72.207.1.73


Your Name / Email Address:

Please enter the above numbers