Forgot your password?
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
  • default color
  • green color
  • red color


Jul 07th
Home Columns Dissenting Opinion International Committee DEFEND Condemns False Charges of Multiple Murder Against Filipino Opposition
International Committee DEFEND Condemns False Charges of Multiple Murder Against Filipino Opposition PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 1
Columns - Dissenting Opinion
Sunday, 06 July 2008 07:00

Since last Friday, the propagandists of the Arroyo regime have been drumming up in the mass media the news that the so-called Inopacan, Southern Leyte, case of multiple murder has been transferred from the Hilongos, Leyte, regional trial court to the Manila regional trial court and has been raffled off to Branch No. 32.

We, the International Committee DEFEND, condemn in the strongest terms the false charge of multiple murder that has been fabricated by the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP), the prosecution office of the Philippine Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Inter-Agency Legal Action Group (IALAG) against prominent Filipino opposition leaders. 
Those falsely charged include Bayan Muna Rep. Satur Ocampo, chairperson of the negotiating panel of the National Democratic Front of the Philippines Luis Jalandoni (NDFP), NDFP chief political consultant Prof. Jose Maria Sison and consultants Randall Echanis, Vicente Ladlad and Rafael Baylosis. 

The charge stems from the skeletal remains bought and collected by the Philippine military authorities from different cemeteries in the Philippines and then placed in a made-up mass grave in Inopacan, Southern Leyte, for the psywar purposes of the military officers headed by then AFP Chief of Staff General Hermogenes Esperon in 2006. 
The military authorities have claimed that the skeletal remains are those of personnel of the New People's Army (NPA) whose killings were part of a “purge of spies” allegedly ordered in 1985 by the accused Filipino opposition leaders. But the charge is a patent lie and is seen as such by the public. Those accused were mostly under maximum security detention by the Marcos fascist dictatorship or were in other circumstances that made it impossible for them to commit the alleged crime. 
The principal accused, Prof. Jose Maria Sison, was in solitary confinement at Fort Bonifacio and was not the chairman of the Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP). Satur Ocampo, Randall Echanis, Vicente Ladlad and Rafael Baylosis were also under maximum security detention. Luis Jalandoni had been in The Netherlands as a political refugee since the late seventies. The charge is rubbish. The lack of factual basis and falsity of the allegation are glaring. 
Moreover, during the Marcos fascist dictatorship, the charge of rebellion, together with the charge of subversion, absorbed all allegations of rebellion-related criminal wrongdoing, including the belated allegation in 2006 about the 1985 “mass grave” against the opposition leaders. The charges of rebellion and subversion were all nullified after the fall of Marcos. It is a violation of the right against double jeopardy to incriminate and punish the accused for incidents of the rebellion in 1985. 
Furthermore, the Philippine Supreme Court finalized on 2 July 2007, its decision to order the dismissal and nullification of the rebellion charge against Prof. Jose Maria Sison and 50 other opposition leaders for acts of rebellion that spanned the long period, from the 1968 reestablishment of the Communist Party of the Philippines to the 2006 filing of the aforesaid rebellion charge. 
The current charge against the Filipino opposition leaders has no factual and legal basis. If the Manila trial court to which the case is assigned has any sense, it should declare the charge as baseless and unjust and should dismiss it without delay. It is anomalous enough that the case is flagrantly unfounded and politically motivated. This case has dragged on to serve the political purposes of the Arroyo regime. 
The same kind of military lawyers and prosecutors from the DOJ, who are directed by the IALAG of the national security adviser Norberto Gonzales and who were berated by the Supreme Court for allowing the prostitution of the function of prosecution, are involved in the current false charge. It is extremely shameless for the Arroyo regime to use false criminal charges, the prosecution and the courts to persecute innocent people. 
The Arroyo regime is utterly condemnable for refusing to abolish the IALAG. The UN special rapporteur Philip Alston on extrajudicial killings and summary executions and the most respected international defenders of human rights have long denounced the IALAG for emboldening, condoning and covering up human rights violations and have therefore demanded its abolition. 
Instead, the Arroyo regime has persisted in using the IALAG to oppress opposition leaders in the Philippines and abroad, including Prof. Jose Maria Sison and Luis Jalandoni, who are supposed to be protected by the 
Refugee Convention and Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights and who should be beyond the tentacles of IALAG and the jurisdiction of the oppressive state in the Philippines. # # # 
For reference please contact: 
Ruth de Leon 
International Committee DEFEND 
Telephone: 00-31-30-8895306 


Related news items:
Newer news items:
Older news items:

Last Updated on Sunday, 06 July 2008 07:36

Add your comment

Your name:
Your email:
Comment (you may use HTML tags here):

Who's Online

We have 72 guests online


Please consider supporting the "ReVOTElution of Hope" for Sorsogon as the Pilot Province. Please see "ReVOTElution" Banner on this page for details.


Quote of the Day

When I read about the evils of drinking,I gave up reading.~Henny Youngman