Forgot your password?
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
  • default color
  • green color
  • red color


Mar 21st
Home Sections Health and Medicine CA Hospital Reverses Language Policy As Filipino Employees Win $975K Anti-Bias Case
CA Hospital Reverses Language Policy As Filipino Employees Win $975K Anti-Bias Case PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 1
Sections - Health and Medicine
Tuesday, 18 September 2012 20:27




(© 2012 Journal Group Link International)


C HICAGO (jGLi) – The 70 Filipinos, who won a $975,000 discrimination suit against a big hospital in Eastern California, which banned them from speaking Filipino languages at the workplace, got an added bonus when the hospital reversed its policy that was the subject of their lawsuit.

Filipino employees now do have the “right to communicate with each other in a language of their choice when not engaged in direct communication with, or while providing care or services to a patient.”

The can now speak Tagalog or any other Filipino languages when they are “in break rooms, cafeteria or other areas where staff take personal breaks.”

The California Department of Fair Employment and Housing and/or the Federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission are going to make sure that the Filipino complainants are not going to be subjected retaliation for filing the complaints.

The Delano Regional Medical Center (DRMC), an acute care hospital in California’s San Joaquin Valley, will pay $975,000 to settle a lawsuit filed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and the Asian Pacific American Legal Center (APALC) on behalf of a class of approximately 70 Filipino-American hospital workers.


The settlement, announced Monday, Sept. 17, resolves the EEOC’s and APALC’s charges that the workers endured ongoing harassment and discrimination due to their national origin, stemming from the top levels of hospital management.

Since at least 2006, the Filipino-American hospital workers, mostly nursing staff, alleged that they were the targets of harassing comments, undue scrutiny and discipline particularly when speaking with a Filipino accent or in Filipino languages like Tagalog or Ilocano. Supervisors, staff, and even volunteers were allegedly encouraged to act as vigilantes, constantly berating and reprimanding Filipino-American employees for nearly six years.



A ccording to the EEOC, staff constantly made fun of their accents, ordering them to speak English even when they were already speaking in English. Some Filipino-American workers endured humiliating threats of arrest if they did not speak English and were told to go back to the Philippines.

In a particularly offensive incident, an employee sprayed air freshener on a claimant’s lunch due to the offender’s self-professed hatred of Filipino food.

The hostile work environment stemmed from a 2006 meeting in which the chief executive officer and hospital management called only Filipino-American staff to a meeting and threatened them about the consequences of not complying with the hospital’s English-only language policy, including the installation of surveillance equipment to monitor their conversations. No other groups were targeted in the meeting.


The policy allegedly required employees to speak in English except when speaking to a patient with other needs or during break time.

Rather than enforcing the policy with all staff, the EEOC asserted that solely Filipino-American staff was disciplined for alleged infractions and constantly monitored for enforcement of the policy. Non-Filipino staff who routinely spoke languages other than English – such as Spanish – on the job were not disciplined or harassed as a result. Ultimately, about 115 Filipino-American workers signed a petition reporting the discrimination and harassment to top-level hospital management.

However, hospital management continuously failed to investigate the allegations or take any action to stop it for an extensive period of time thereafter.




T he EEOC filed suit against the hospital in August 2010 in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California (EEOC v. Central California Foundation for Health d/b/a Delano Regional Medical Center, Case No. 10-CV-01492-LJO-JLT). The EEOC argued that this conduct violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Thereafter, on Jan. 18, 2011, APALC partnered with the EEOC, intervening in the EEOC’s lawsuit and bringing forth its own lawsuit on behalf of several more alleged victims.


As part of the settlement announced Monday, the parties entered into a three-year consent decree requiring DRMC to pay $975,000 in monetary relief, to develop strong protocols for handling harassment and discrimination, and to adopt a language policy that complies with Title VII. The hospital further agreed to hire an EEO monitor to assist DRMC to comply with the terms of the agreement; to revise policies and procedures; and, to conduct anti-harassment and anti-discrimination training for all staff with additional training for supervisors. The hospital will submit reports to the EEOC and will post a notice on the matter. The EEOC will monitor compliance with the consent decree.


“Employees should never be targeted because of their national origin or language,” said EEOC General Counsel P. David Lopez. “The EEOC stands ready to assist employees nationwide who believe they have suffered workplace discrimination, and to ensure that our work force reflects the rich diversity of our nation.”




T he EEOC is working with the White House and other agencies to improve the quality of life and opportunities for Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders by facilitating increased access to and participation in federal programs where they remain underserved.


Anna Park, regional attorney for the EEOC's Los Angeles District Office, said, “The EEOC continues to see the improper implementation of language policies that contradict the civil rights of employees in the health care industry. All employers should take DRMC's lead and ensure that their language policies do not violate federal law. We commend the Filipino-American workers who came forward, and we encourage other Asian-Americans and Pacific Islanders to do the same if they experience discrimination or retaliation in the workplace.”


Plaintiff Wilma Lamug, a licensed vocational nurse who worked at DRMC for more than 10 years, said, “We Filipino nurses loved our jobs and always gave outstanding care to our patients, and it was humiliating to be harassed and singled out. We wanted to be free from discrimination and EEOC and APALC helped us fight for justice. We hope that this case will serve as a model to others. Workers deserve respect as human beings and deserve to be treated fairly.”


“DRMC enforced an overly restrictive English only policy against its Filipino American employees and created a workplace environment that was hostile towards them,” said Laboni Hoq, litigation director at APALC. “This landmark settlement should send a strong message to employers that it is illegal to target workers based on their national origin and will hopefully encourage more Asian American and immigrant workers to speak out when their rights are violated. We applaud the EEOC for initiating this case, and for standing with us in fighting for a resolution that not only vindicated our clients' rights but also lays the groundwork for more just language policies in other workplaces.”


According to its website, the Delano Regional Medical Center employs over 600 staffers, including over 130 physicians, with about 156 hospital beds in the city of Delano, located about 30 miles north of Bakersfield, Calif.


The EEOC enforces federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination. Further information about the EEOC is available on its web site at # # #


Watch out for the upcoming media-outlet oriented, subscription-based website of Journal Group Link International that guarantees originally sourced stories, features, photos, audios and videos and multi-media contents.)


Editor’s Note: To contact the author, please e-mail him at: (



Newer news items:
Older news items:

Last Updated on Tuesday, 18 September 2012 22:30

Add your comment

Your name:
Your email:
Comment (you may use HTML tags here):

Quote of the Day

"I told him, 'Son, what is it with you. Is it ignorance or apathy?' He said, 'Coach, I don't know and I don't care.' "--Frank Layden, Utah Jazz president, on a former player

Pilipinas Tours