The "Triage" from
John L. Seitz, "Global Issues", states "A forecast of doom for the future of humanity has led some
authors to recommend policies designed to deal with such situation. One
called "triage" was discussed in Famine
1975! by William
and Paul Paddock. Triage is a
procedure that was used in World War I when doctors in battle field hospitals
had to decided which of the many wounded would receive the limited medical care
available.
The wounded were
divided into three categories. The fist were those soldiers who were only
slightly wounded and, although in pain, would probably survive even if untreated.
The second category consisted of soldiers who were seriously wounded that even
if they received medical attention, they would probably die. In the third
category were soldiers who were seriously wounded but who could probably be
saved if the doctors treated them. It was to the last category that the
military doctors first turned their attention.
The Paddock brothers recommended that the United States place countries of the
world who were requesting food aid into three categories similar to those in the
triage procedure and give aid only to those countries in the third category,
that is, to those which would have a good chance of progressing to a state of
being able to survive by their own efforts if they received some aid."
"Lifeboat ethics" is a policy suggested by biologist Garret Hardin in a world of desperately poor-and-overcrowded
countries. Mr. Hardin used the metaphor of lifeboats at sea, some of which
are threatened to be swamped by people in the water trying to get in.
According to Hardin, the people in the lifeboats that are not completely
filled, have three choices.
The first is to take in everyone who wants to get on board; but that would lead
to the lifeboats being swamped and everyone drowning.
The second choice is to take on only a few to fill the empty seats; but that
would lead to the loss of the small margin of safety and make for a very
difficult decision as to which few will be selected. The third choice is
to take no further people on board and to protect against boarding parties.
Hardin saw the rich nations of the world as being in partially filled lifeboats
and the poor nations as being in overcrowded boats wit people spilling into the
water because of their inability to control their population growth.
Mr. Hardin recommends the third choice for the United States. He admits this is probably
unjust, but recommends that those who feel guilty about it can trade places
with those in the water. Goodwilled but basically misguided efforts by
the United States to aid poor countries suffering the long
run. The emergency food aid contributes to a larger population eventually
and thus a deeper crisis in the future” (pp 210-212).
My thoughts:
1. Are the United States and other rich countries seriously
concerned about the plight of the poor countries, including the Philippines?
2. If some gut-wrenching initiatives are undertaken in the
Homeland – imposing the rule of law, a gut-wrenching prevention for the
nincompoops and the plunderers not to be elected to power and authority, a bureaucracy
and an administrative system working efficiently, the creation of a broad
united front among those groups screaming that they are the Vanguard of the
oppressed, a more potent organization of just a significant and critical number
of the 11 million Filipinos in Diaspora to focus their attention, share their
skills and whatever resources they can muster for the homeland, so that they
can help in draining the swamps that breed rebellions, fanaticism, and
martyrdom, is their even a need to think about “Triage” and “Lifeboat ethics”?
3. The programs of Howie Severino of the lives of the poorest of the poor, of humans severely
incapacitated due to malnutrition, of homeless children, of young women
prostituting themselves for a ganta of rice and children smoking drugs to
assuage their hunger, of families sleeping with the dead in the graveyards, I
wonder if the powerful in the Homeland are still affected by such misery?
Comments, anyone? # # #
Related news items:
Newer news items:
Older news items:
|